Consultancy
Decisions before deliverables: what to build, what to buy, what to fix first.
Select any item to reveal the detail.
I review your current training against how people actually use it: completion data, learner feedback, the content itself. You get a plain-English report on what is working, what is not, and a fix list ranked by effort against impact, so you know where to start.
A program plan built on outcomes and evidence rather than content volume. It names the capabilities that matter, the gaps against them, and the sequence of builds that closes those gaps. Written to survive contact with your budget cycle.
A shortlist and recommendation from someone who has built and shipped inside these platforms, not just watched the demo. Scored against your actual requirements: authoring workflow, reporting, accessibility, integration and total cost. You keep the scoring matrix.
Where assistants genuinely help, how to ground them in your own documentation so they answer accurately, and where to hold back. Practical guardrails your team can apply, drawn from assistants I have shipped inside real courses.
Templates, standards and working sessions so your team ships consistent work without me in the room. The goal is a process you own: storyboard formats, QA checklists, brand components. I make myself progressively unnecessary.
Student Success Portal.